Skip to main content

New Frontiers of AI and Copyright Law: A Case Study of ANI VS Open AI

 

Whenever these two words—copyright law and AI—are heard together, the very first corollary drawn is with respect to the challenge of harmonizing the former with the latter. Copyright law is, by effect, applicable to works of an author, but nowhere is AI mentioned as an author, so to give AI the cloak of an author and AI's work the protection of Copyright Law was the very first question for consideration.

With the advancement of AI, such challenges have been identified that call for a significant overhaul in the current laws of Copyright and laws governing AI. While this challenge of harmony between work generated by Artificial Intelligence and Copyright Law is being attended to, a new challenge has come up calling for attention.

 

The Legal Battle

In the backdrop of advancement, AI has used copyrighted content to train itself without the author's permission. ANI, Asian News International, a prominent news agency that has a big role in providing multi-media news to various agencies, covers all news from all over India, discovered that Chat GPT, a prominent Large Language Model, an artificial intelligence chatbot that has the capabilities of generating human-like responses, was generating human-like responses from sources of ANI's news articles without authorization. This led to ANI filing a copyright infringement suit before the Delhi High Court against Open AI, a leading AI research company.

ANI, therefore, filed a copyright infringement suit before the Delhi High Court against Open AI. The case, which is complex and multifaceted, revolves around the unauthorized use of ANI's content by Open AI's Chat GPT. ANI firmly held its ground, asserting that Open AI should have obtained permission or respected its licensing agreement. In contrast, Open AI, as the respondents, challenged the jurisdiction of Indian Courts and argued that their training for Chat GPT is done from publicly available data, thus no copyrighted content is used.

 As admitted by the counsel on behalf of Open AI, Open AI is currently facing suits of similar kinds in sixteen different countries, which shows the gravity of the problem.

A parallel case worth mentioning is The New York Times lawsuit against Open AI in 2023 concerning data scraping and unauthorized content use. While that case proceeds in the U.S., the ANI case presents an opportunity to observe how the Indian legal system will respond to these emerging concerns. This response could potentially shape the future of Copyright Law with respect to Artificial Intelligence, leading to new regulations and practices.

 

Investigation Bottlenecks

What are LLMs? Large Language Models are a type of foundational AI model developed using a huge dataset, enabling them to comprehend and produce human-like language and other content formats across diverse tasks. What number is a considerable amount? LLMs can study approximately 3.10 billion pages of data at a single time. This number is not as huge as it can get; it's bound to increase with the advancement. With such a large number of data to study from, it would be next to impossible for anyone to know what a model like Chat GPT is learning on the internet to find copyrighted content being studied.

Furthermore, after studying all the data and learning like a human, LLMs tend to rephrase what they have studied while answering a particular prompt. This rephrasing, akin to human explanation, makes it a complex and resource-intensive task to backtrack and analyze the response, especially when it involves copyrighted content. This complexity adds another layer of challenge to the legal battle between AI and Copyright Law.

____________________________________________________________________

~ Purav Garg

Research Associate, World Cyber Security Forum

(B.Com LLB (H), UILS, Chandigarh)

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

India's Cybersecurity Landscape: New Rules, Rising Threats, and Government Response

The recent interaction of the newly reappointed Union IT Minister with journalists has sparked significant interest within the IT Industry and among privacy enthusiasts. Ashwini Vaishnaw announced on June 15 that the MEITY will soon release the rules under the Digital Personal Data Protection (DPDP) Act, a development of immense significance for India's cybersecurity landscape. [1] 's Acts. It holds immense significance for the country, especially with the increasing number of internet users.  Of 2023 for public consultation. The rules hold immense significance for a country like India, with 751.5 million internet users at the commencement of 2024 [2] . With the continuous surge in internet usage across India, the volume of personal data shared online is also on the rise. This occurs either voluntarily, such as an individual providing personal information to a social media platform to access its services, or involuntarily, as a consequence of falling victim to a cybercrime inci...
Post a Comment
Read more

UNESCO Guidelines on Generative AI in Schools

The advent of artificial intelligence has assumed prominence amongst all industries and various facets of people's personal lives. The integration of AI in education has been inevitable, given the significance and role of information, knowledge production and administration in the sector. This is especially so as its capabilities entail replicating higher-order thinking. Besides assisting in the education process, it also brings the element of real-life relevance, allowing education to be imparted against the backdrop of the evolving world due to the same AI. It tends to have implications on the subject matter that needs to be imparted, which tends to be something that constantly needs to answer the question of "Why and how is this particular subject matter relevant for learning?".  This induces policy-makers and educational institutions to rethink what they need to impart as knowledge, the area of matter, and the manner of thinking to be emphasised. This is because educa...
Post a Comment
Read more

International Data Transfers under GDPR

One goal of the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) is to facilitate the free movement of personal data among member states under shared data protection principles. However, the Regulation also acknowledges that transferring personal data to non-member countries demands special attention. Chapter V of GDPR specifically talks about the transfers of personal data to third countries only when:- The third country must ensure an adequate level of protection for personal data as determined by the European Commission. If such protection is not in place, the data controller or processor must provide appropriate safeguards, ensuring enforceable rights and effective legal remedies for data subjects. Alternatively, if neither adequate protection nor appropriate safeguards are present, the transfer of personal data must fall within one of the specific derogations outlined in the Regulation. To better understand the concept of International Data Transfer, we first need to understand what the ...
Post a Comment
Read more